本文结合法规和指南对于持续稳定性的相关要求,对比分析各法规和指南对于持续稳定性考察目的、持续稳定性考察方案设计的相关要求,评估和论述持续稳定性考察简化设计的思路,文章中英文部分为法规和指南原文,分析总结部分为法规和指南的解读,供读者参考。
• 中国 GMP--- 第十章 质量控制与质量保证
持续稳定性考察(On-going Stability Monitoring)持续稳定性考察的目的是在有效期内监控已上市药品的质量,以发现药品与生产相关的稳定性问题(如杂质含量或溶出度特性的变化),并确定药品能够在标示的贮存条件下,符合质量标准的各项要求。
• EU GMP
6.27 The purpose of the on-going stability programme is to monitor the product over its shelf life and to determine that the product remains, and can be expected to remain, within specifications under the labelled storage conditions.
6.30 The protocol for an on-going stability programme should extend to the end of the shelf life period and should include, but not be limited to, the following parameters:
• WHO稳定性指南
The purpose of the ongoing stability programme is to monitor the product over its shelf-life and to determine that the product remains, and can be expected to remain, within Specifications under the storage conditions on the label.
• ICH Q7
11.50 A documented, on-going testing program should be established to monitor the stability characteristics of APIs, and the results should be used to confirm appropriate storage conditions and retest or expiry dates.
总结:持续稳定性考察的目的是在有效期/复检期内监控药品的质量,确定药品能够在标示的贮存条件下,符合质量标准的各项要求。
Ø 持续稳定性考察方案
- 原料药
类别 |
法规及指南 |
设计要求 |
原料药 |
WHO Stability testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished pharmaceutical products |
At least one production batch per year of API (unless none is produced during that year) should be added to the stability monitoring program and generally should be tested at least every 6 months in the first year and then annually to confirm the stability |
ICH Q7A WHO GMP EU GMP part 2 PIC/S GMP |
11.54
Thereafter, at least one batch per year of API manufactured (unless none is
produced that year) should be added to the stability monitoring program and
tested at least annually to confirm the stability. |
|
中国GMP2010 |
第二百三十四条 持续稳定性考察的时间应当涵盖药品有效期,考察方案应当至少包括以下内容: 第二百三十五条 考察批次数和检验频次应当能够获得足够的数据,以供趋势分析。通常情况下,每种规格、每种内包装形式的药品,至少每年应当考察一个批次,除非当年没有生产 |
|
|
ICH Q1D BRACKETING AND MATRIXING DESIGNS FOR STABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS |
2.4.2 Design Considerations A matrixing design should be balanced as far as possible so that each combination of factors is tested to the same extent over the intended duration of the study and through the last time point prior to submission. However, due to the recommended full testing at certain time points, as discussed below, it may be difficult to achieve a complete balance in a design where time points are matrixed. In a design where time points are matrixed, all selected factor combinations should be tested at the initial and final time points, while only certain fractions of the designated combinations should be tested at each intermediate time point. If full long-term data for the proposed shelf life will not be available for review before approval, all selected combinations of batch, strength, container size, and fill, among other things, should also be tested at 12 months or at the last time point prior to submission. In addition, data from at least three time points, including initial, should be available for each selected combination through the first 12 months of the study. For matrixing at an accelerated or intermediate storage condition, care should be taken to ensure testing occurs at a minimum of three time points, including initial and final, for each selected combination of factors. ICH Q1D 矩阵法(测试点矩阵)设计有两点相关的要求: • 起始点和最终点必须进行测试。 • 前12个月至少检测3个点。 |
分析:
1、 WHO指南中指出对于持续稳定性考察的测试方案可以与注册不同,对于原料药,要求第一年至少每6个月测试,然后每年测试;
2、 ICH Q7要求至少每年测试,对于效期较短的产品(例如12个月),稳定性数据积累后可省略9个月的测试点;
3、 ICH Q1D 矩阵法(测试点矩阵)设计适用于新产品的稳定性考察,持续稳定性考察简化设计可进行参考,ICH Q1D 矩阵法(测试点矩阵)设计有两点相关的要求:起始点和最终点必须进行测试,前12个月至少检测3个点。
- 制剂
制剂 |
法规及指南 |
测试频率 |
WHO Stability testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished pharmaceutical products |
The protocol for the ongoing stability programme can be different from that of the initial long-term stability study as submitted in the marketing authorization dossier provided that this is justified and documented in the protocol (for example, the frequency of testing as above, or when updating to meet revised recommendations). The number of batches and frequency of testing should provide sufficient data to allow for trend analysis. Unless otherwise justified, at least one batch per year of product manufactured in every strength and every primary packaging type, if relevant, should be included in the stability programme (unless none is produced during that year). The principle of bracketing and matrixing designs may be applied if scientifically justified in the protocol (refer to ICH Q1D). |
|
中国GMP2010 |
第二百三十四条 持续稳定性考察的时间应当涵盖药品有效期,考察方案应当至少包括以下内容: 第二百三十五条 考察批次数和检验频次应当能够获得足够的数据,以供趋势分析。通常情况下,每种规格、每种内包装形式的药品,至少每年应当考察一个批次,除非当年没有生产 |
|
EU GMP PIC/S GMP |
6.30 The protocol for an on-going stability programme should extend to the end of the shelf life period and should include, but not be limited to, the following parameters: 6.31 The protocol for the on-going stability programme can be different from that of the initial long-term stability study as submitted in the marketing authorisation dossier provided that this is justified and documented in the protocol (for example the frequency of testing, or when updating to ICH/VICH recommendations). 6.32 The number of batches and frequency of testing should provide a sufficient amount of data to allow for trend analysis. Unless otherwise justified, at least one batch per year of product manufactured in every strength and every primary packaging type, if relevant, should be included in the stability programme (unless none are produced during that year). |
|
WHO GMP |
Stability studies 17.22 QC should evaluate the quality and stability of finished pharmaceutical products and, when necessary, of starting materials and intermediate products. 17.23 QC should establish expiry dates and shelf-life specifications on the basis of stability tests related to storage conditions. 17.24 A written programme for ongoing stability determination should be developed and implemented to include elements such as: (a) a complete description of the medicine involved in the study;(b) the complete set of testing parameters and methods, describing all tests for potency, purity, and physical characteristics and documented evidence that these tests indicate stability;(c) provision for the inclusion of a sufficient number of batches;(d) the testing schedule for each medicine;(e) provision for special storage conditions;(f) provision for adequate sample retention;(g) a summary of all the data generated, including the evaluation and the conclusions of the study. |
|
FDA. CFR Title 21 – Food and Drugs Part 211 Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals |
(a) There shall be a written testing program designed to assess the stability characteristics of drug products. The results of such stability testing shall be used in determining appropriate storage conditions and expiration dates. The written program shall be followed and shall include: (1) Sample size and test intervals based on statistical criteria for each attribute examined to assure valid estimates of stability; (2) Storage conditions for samples retained for testing; (3) Reliable, meaningful, and specific test methods; (4) Testing of the drug product in the same container-closure system as that in which the drug product is marketed; (5) Testing of drug products for reconstitution at the time of dispensing (as directed in the labeling) as well as after they are reconstituted. |
|
ICH Q1D BRACKETING AND MATRIXING DESIGNS FOR STABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS |
2.4.2 Design Considerations A matrixing design should be balanced as far as possible so that each combination of factors is tested to the same extent over the intended duration of the study and through the last time point prior to submission. However, due to the recommended full testing at certain time points, as discussed below, it may be difficult to achieve a complete balance in a design where time points are matrixed. In a design where time points are matrixed, all selected factor combinations should be tested at the initial and final time points, while only certain fractions of the designated combinations should be tested at each intermediate time point. If full long-term data for the proposed shelf life will not be available for review before approval, all selected combinations of batch, strength, container size, and fill, among other things, should also be tested at 12 months or at the last time point prior to submission. In addition, data from at least three time points, including initial, should be available for each selected combination through the first 12 months of the study. For matrixing at an accelerated or intermediate storage condition, care should be taken to ensure testing occurs at a minimum of three time points, including initial and final, for each selected combination of factors. ICH Q1D 矩阵法(测试点矩阵)设计有两点相关的要求: l 起始点和最终点必须进行测试。 l 前12个月至少检测3个点。 |
分析:
1、 WHO GMP/EU GMP/中国GMP/WHO稳定性指南中均规定了持续稳定性考察的频率可以与首次注册申报不同,测试频率应该提供足够的数据用于统计分析。
2、 ICH Q1D 矩阵法(测试点矩阵)设计适用于新产品的稳定性考察,持续稳定性考察简化设计可进行参考,有两点相关的要求:起始点和最终点必须进行测试,前12个月至少检测3个点,
Ø 持续稳定性考察简化设计
基于上述论述,原料药和制剂的持续稳定性考察方案设计要求如下:
1、 原料药和制剂的持续稳定性考察应该至少涵盖其复检期或有效期。
2、 原料药和制剂的持续稳定性考察可与注册批长期稳定性考察频率不同。
4、 对于原料药的持续稳定性考察的建议频率,法规和指南中较明确;
-ICH Q7A要求至少每年测试,对于效期较短的产品(例如12个月),稳定性数据积累后可省略9个月的测试点;
-WHO指南中指出对于持续稳定性考察的测试方案可以与注册不同,对于原料药,要求第一年至少每6个月测试,然后每年测试;
5、 对于制剂的持续稳定性考察,法规和指南中均规定了持续稳定性考察的频率可以与首次注册申报不同,但测试频率应该提供足够的数据用于统计分析。
6、 ICH Q1D 括弧和矩阵法稳定性设计适用于新产品的稳定性考察,在持续稳定性考察简化设计时可进行参考。
Note:稳定性考察方案简化设计的前提是产品或原料药应具有足够的稳定性数据积累,对产品或原料药的稳定性趋势有充分的了解,同时对于简化的方案应进行充分的论述,测试频率应该提供足够的数据用于统计分析。
为帮助审核人员更快处理,请填写举报原因:
为帮助审核人员更快处理,请填写举报原因: